Right to Work???

Even at Walmart? It seems to me the world's largest employer could stand a little union action. The Auto Union was certainly unreasonable of many fronts. But they did not do GM or the others in nearly as much as their backward management and the cars they made.

My response to that comment is look where the jobs are going now days. GM and other "union" companies paid the high price of bankruptcy. Unions have served their purpose. No one should have to join a union to work.

Hi Forum,

Another political question here. Given the local economy and state of the US worker these days, do you support and think the "right to work" laws of this State are good for workers or not?

The "right to work" laws are mostly operative in the South and in "Red" States. Unions oppose them. A union response follows the ask.com definition of "right to work" below:


State right to work laws essentially require unionized workplaces to become "open shops". Open shops must allow employees to work, whether or not they join the associated unions or pay regular dues.

At this writing, the following are right to work states, meaning that they have specific right to work laws.

• Alabama
  
• Arizona
  
• Arkansas
  
• Florida
  
• Georgia
  
• Idaho
  
• Iowa
  
• Kansas
  
• Louisiana
  
• Mississippi
  
• Nebraska
  
• Nevada
  
• North Carolina
  
• North Dakota
  
• Oklahoma
  
• South Carolina
  
• South Dakota
  
• Tennessee
  
• Texas
  
• Utah
  
• Virginia
  
• Wyoming
  
• 
  __________________
  

The AFL-CIO website says:
Right to Work for Less



To set the record (and the name) straight, right to work for less doesn’t guarantee any rights. In fact, by weakening unions and collective bargaining, it destroys the best job security protection that exists: the union contract. Meanwhile, it allows workers to pay nothing and get all the benefits of union membership. Right to work laws say unions must represent all eligible employees, whether they pay dues or not. This forces unions to use their time and members’ dues money to provide union benefits to free riders who are not willing to pay their fair share.

Right to work laws lower wages for everyone. The average worker in a right to work state makes about $5,333 a year less than workers in other states ($35,500 compared with $30,167).[1] Weekly wages are $72 greater in free-bargaining states than in right to work states ($621 versus $549).[2] Working families in states without right to work laws have higher wages and benefit from healthier tax bases that improve their quality of life.

Federal law already protects workers who don’t want to join a union to get or keep their jobs. Supporters claim right to work laws protect employees from being forced to join unions. Don’t be fooled—federal law already does this, as well as protecting nonmembers from paying for union activities that violate their religious or political beliefs. This individual freedom argument is a sham.

Right to work endangers safety and health standards that protect workers on the job by weakening unions that help to ensure worker safety by fighting for tougher safety rules. According to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, the rate of workplace deaths is 51 percent higher in states with right to work, where unions can’t speak up on behalf of workers.[3]

Right to work laws just aren’t fair to dues-paying members. If a nonunion worker is fired illegally, the union must use its time and money to defend him or her, even if that requires going through a costly legal process. Everyone benefits, so all should share in the process. Nonmembers can even sue the union if they think it has not represented them well enough.